Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2006-2009Illinois
WR • 6'5" • Columbus, OH, USA
Jeff Cumberland reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.1
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
51
Season Value
45.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Cumberland, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Illinois. Jeff Cumberland reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeff Cumberland played WR for Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeff Cumberland recorded 65 rushing yards, 1,001 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Illinois paired 352 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
10.1
Consistency
51
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 27. Ohio State: 6. Indiana: 3. Michigan: 51. Minnesota: 45. Northwestern: 17. Cincinnati: 7. Fresno State: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 2 by 90. Ohio State: 1 by 40. Indiana: 1 by 20. Michigan: 2 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 46.7. Fresno State: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | vs Fresno State | L 52-53 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Cincinnati | L 36-49 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Northwestern | L 16-21 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Minnesota | W 35-32 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Michigan | W 38-13 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Indiana | L 14-27 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Ohio State | L 0-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Missouri | L 9-37 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Illinois
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Illinois | 232 | 84 | 21.6 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Illinois | 243 | 92.6 | 18.9 | 11 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Illinois | 243 | 92.6 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Illinois | 352 | 85.3 | 12.8 | 109 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Illinois | 174 | 74.6 | 10.1 | -178 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Illinois
352 primary output · 85.3 efficiency · 12.8 usage
62.7
#2
2006 Regular Season · Illinois
59.5
232 primary · 84 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Illinois
56.8
243 primary · 92.6 efficiency · 18.9 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9405
Brookhaven · Columbus, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,001
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.