Player Stats

DeMarco Murray College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
5,256
Rushing yards
3,685
Receiving yards
1,571
Touchdowns
63

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonOklahoma11824764601359.1
2008 Regular SeasonOklahoma121,3971,0023951871.3
2009 PostseasonOklahoma12672740168.1
2009 Regular SeasonOklahoma121,1606784821168.1
2010 PostseasonOklahoma149293-1182
2010 Regular SeasonOklahoma141,7161,1215951982

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 1,808 primary output with 50.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 50.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

129.1

Efficiency

50.1

Usage

36.7

Consistency

78.1

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UConn: 92. Utah State: 208. Florida State: 103. Air Force: 148. Cincinnati: 88. Texas: 146. Iowa State: 140. Missouri: 97. Colorado: 113. Texas A&M: 147. Texas Tech: 95. Baylor: 182. Oklahoma State: 121. Nebraska: 128

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 27 by 37.4. Utah State: 35 by 61.9. Florida State: 20 by 41.4. Air Force: 31 by 46.3. Cincinnati: 35 by 25.4. Texas: 29 by 49.7. Iowa State: 22 by 61.5. Missouri: 20 by 45.7. Colorado: 21 by 45.1. Texas A&M: 35 by 37.5. Texas Tech: 11 by 86. Baylor: 19 by 69.7. Oklahoma State: 26 by 44.4. Nebraska: 22 by 49.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins130.3 · Games = 12 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses122 · Games = 2 · -8.3 vs Wins