Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Oklahoma
DeMarco Murray
RB • 6'1" • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
DeMarco Murray leans workhorse runner traits and 50.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.1
Consistency
78.1
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oklahoma
070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeMarco Murray, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oklahoma. DeMarco Murray leans workhorse runner traits and 50.1 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 1,808 primary output with 50.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
129.1
Efficiency
50.1
Usage
36.7
Consistency
78.1
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 92. Utah State: 208. Florida State: 103. Air Force: 148. Cincinnati: 88. Texas: 146. Iowa State: 140. Missouri: 97. Colorado: 113. Texas A&M: 147. Texas Tech: 95. Baylor: 182. Oklahoma State: 121. Nebraska: 128
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 27 by 37.4. Utah State: 35 by 61.9. Florida State: 20 by 41.4. Air Force: 31 by 46.3. Cincinnati: 35 by 25.4. Texas: 29 by 49.7. Iowa State: 22 by 61.5. Missouri: 20 by 45.7. Colorado: 21 by 45.1. Texas A&M: 35 by 37.5. Texas Tech: 11 by 86. Baylor: 19 by 69.7. Oklahoma State: 26 by 44.4. Nebraska: 22 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Wins130.3 · n=12 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses122 · n=2 · -8.3 vs Wins
First Half132.1 · n=7 · +6 vs Second Half
Second Half126.1 · n=7 · -6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
86 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/2 | vs UConn | W 48-20 | 25 | 93 | 3.70 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3.4 |
| Sun 12/5 | @ Nebraska | W 23-20 | 17 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 60 | 5.8 |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Oklahoma State | W 47-41 | 20 | 80 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 41 | 4.7 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Baylor150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 53-24 | 13 | 62 | 4.80 | 1 | 6 | 120 | 9.6 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Texas Tech | W 45-7 | 9 | 79 | 8.80 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8.6 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 19-33 | 25 | 80 | 3.20 | 1 | 10 | 67 | 4.2 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Colorado | W 43-10 | 11 | 40 | 3.60 | 1 | 10 | 73 | 5.4 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ Missouri | L 27-36 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 0 | 8 | 48 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Iowa State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 52-0 | 20 | 112 | 5.60 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 28-20 | 25 | 115 | 4.60 | 2 | 4 | 31 | 5.0 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Cincinnati | W 31-29 | 28 | 67 | 2.40 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Air Force100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 27-24 | 26 | 110 | 4.20 | 2 | 5 | 38 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Florida State2+ TD | W 47-17 | 16 | 51 | 3.20 | 2 | 4 | 52 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Utah State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-24 | 35 | 208 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 824 | 57.2 | 21.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,397 | 59.9 | 26.3 | 573 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,227 | 50.1 | 29.3 | -170 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,227 | 50.1 | 29.3 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,808 | 50.1 | 36.7 | 581 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,808 | 50.1 | 36.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
208
Primary metric
208 scrimmage yards and 58.3 usage.
#2
Texas A&M
186
Primary metric
Win with 186 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
186 scrimmage yards and 23.3 usage.
#3
Texas Tech
196
Primary metric
Win with 196 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
196 scrimmage yards and 30.6 usage.
#4
Texas
129
Primary metric
Win with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
129 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
223
Primary metric
Win with 223 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
223 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma
1,808 primary output · 50.1 efficiency · 36.7 usage
66.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Oklahoma
66.2
1,808 primary · 50.1 efficiency · 36.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma
59.9
1,397 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 26.3 usage
Milestones
25
100+ rush yards
6
150+ scrimmage yards
19
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9901
Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
5,256
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.