Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2007-2010Oklahoma
Mossis Madu
RB • 6'0" • Norman, OK, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Mossis Madu leans balanced backfield option traits and 39 efficiency.
Efficiency
39
Consistency
55.8
Season Value
40.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mossis Madu, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma. Mossis Madu leans balanced backfield option traits and 39 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 559 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 39 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
29.1
Efficiency
39
Usage
9
Consistency
55.8
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 3. Florida State: 44. Air Force: 20. Cincinnati: 45. Texas: 52. Iowa State: 46. Missouri: 0. Texas Tech: 72. Baylor: -2. Oklahoma State: 13. Nebraska: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 1 by 31.3. Florida State: 12 by 36.9. Air Force: 6 by 32.6. Cincinnati: 11 by 38.9. Texas: 16 by 31.5. Iowa State: 4 by 97.9. Missouri: 1 by 0. Texas Tech: 9 by 83.3. Baylor: 2 by 0. Oklahoma State: 4 by 24. Nebraska: 4 by 53.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins32 · Games = 10
First Half35 · Games = 6 · +13 vs Second Half
Second Half22 · Games = 5 · -13 vs First Half
All Games29.1 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
97.9 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/2 | vs UConn | W 48-20 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 12/5 | @ Nebraska | W 23-20 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6.8 |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Oklahoma State | W 47-41 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3.3 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Baylor | W 53-24 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Texas Tech | W 45-7 | 9 | 72 | 8 | 0 | — | — | 8 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ Missouri | L 27-36 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Iowa State | W 52-0 | 4 | 46 | 11.50 | 0 | — | — | 11.5 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Texas | W 28-20 | 15 | 43 | 2.90 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Cincinnati | W 31-29 | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 4.1 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Air Force | W 27-24 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Florida State | W 47-17 | 11 | 38 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Oklahoma | 265 | 52.2 | 9.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 265 | 52.2 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma | 559 | 40 | 14.3 | 294 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 559 | 40 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma | 86 | 56.2 | 2 | -473 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 86 | 56.2 | 2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma | 320 | 39 | 9 | 234 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 320 | 39 | 9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 111 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
111
Primary metric
111 scrimmage yards and 17.6 usage.
#2
Missouri
123
Primary metric
Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 22.1 usage.
#3
Texas Tech
72
Primary metric
Win with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 13.6 usage.
#4
Stanford
19
Primary metric
Win with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
18
Primary metric
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 1.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
559 primary output · 40 efficiency · 14.3 usage
52.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma
52.8
559 primary · 40 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma
40.6
320 primary · 39 efficiency · 9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8711
Norman · Norman, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,230
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.