Usage Score
18.9
Player Dossier
2006-2008Oklahoma
TE • 6'6" • 258 lbs • Ardmore, OK, USA
Jermaine Gresham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.9
Efficiency
84.3
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jermaine Gresham, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma. Jermaine Gresham reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 950 primary output with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
67.9
Efficiency
84.3
Usage
18.9
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 62. Unknown: 26. Cincinnati: 93. Washington: 99. TCU: 38. Baylor: 22. Texas: 90. Kansas: 55. Kansas State: 44. Nebraska: 52. Texas A&M: 34. Texas Tech: 95. Oklahoma State: 158. Missouri: 82
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 8 by 51.7. Unknown: 3 by 57.8. Cincinnati: 7 by 88.6. Washington: 3 by 100. TCU: 1 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 73.3. Texas: 5 by 100. Kansas: 5 by 73.3. Kansas State: 3 by 97.8. Nebraska: 5 by 69.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Texas Tech: 5 by 100. Oklahoma State: 9 by 100. Missouri: 8 by 68.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/9 | vs FloridaHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 14-24 | — | 8 | 62 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 2 | 11 |
| Sun 12/7 | vs MissouriHigh volume | W 62-21 | — | 8 | 82 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/30 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 61-41 | — | 9 | 158 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 2 | 73 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Texas Tech | W 65-21 | — | 5 | 95 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 66-28 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Nebraska2+ TD | W 62-28 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Kansas State | W 58-35 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Kansas | W 45-31 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Texas | L 35-45 | — | 5 | 90 | 15.8 | 18 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Baylor | W 49-17 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs TCU | W 35-10 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Washington2+ TD | W 55-14 | — | 3 | 99 | 33 | 33 | 2 | 64 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Cincinnati2+ TD | W 52-26 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 161 | 85 | 6.8 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Oklahoma | 519 | 86.7 | 14.5 | 358 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 519 | 86.7 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma | 950 | 84.3 | 18.9 | 431 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 950 | 84.3 | 18.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
950 primary output · 84.3 efficiency · 18.9 usage
66.7
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma
66.7
950 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Oklahoma
56.2
519 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 14.5 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9731
Ardmore · Ardmore, OK
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,630
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jermaine Gresham quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit