Player Stats

Chris Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,256
Rushing yards
2,933
Receiving yards
323
Touchdowns
45

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 Regular SeasonOklahoma53433430649.7
2007 PostseasonOklahoma1350500156.4
2007 Regular SeasonOklahoma1365457183956.4
2008 PostseasonOklahoma1414711037077
2008 Regular SeasonOklahoma141,1821,110722177
2009 PostseasonOklahoma134346-3068.2
2009 Regular SeasonOklahoma13837703134868.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 1,329 primary output with 59 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho State

Win with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

67.7

Efficiency

46.3

Usage

26.4

Consistency

84.8

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 43. BYU: 67. Idaho State: 93. Tulsa: 84. Miami: 71. Baylor: 78. Texas: 63. Kansas: 74. Kansas State: 83. Nebraska: 70. Texas A&M: 51. Texas Tech: 39. Oklahoma State: 64

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 13 by 37.7. BYU: 15 by 45. Idaho State: 13 by 66.7. Tulsa: 18 by 48. Miami: 11 by 67.2. Baylor: 21 by 38.5. Texas: 16 by 28.4. Kansas: 23 by 32.2. Kansas State: 15 by 57.6. Nebraska: 15 by 45.5. Texas A&M: 8 by 69.4. Texas Tech: 12 by 34.6. Oklahoma State: 21 by 30.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins71.3 · Games = 8 · +9.3 vs Losses
Losses62 · Games = 5 · -9.3 vs Wins