Usage Score
26.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Oklahoma
RB • 5'10" • Alexandria, LA, USA
Chris Brown leans balanced backfield option traits and 46.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
26.4
Efficiency
46.3
Consistency
84.8
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Brown, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma. Chris Brown leans balanced backfield option traits and 46.3 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 1,329 primary output with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
67.7
Efficiency
46.3
Usage
26.4
Consistency
84.8
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 43. BYU: 67. Unknown: 93. Tulsa: 84. Miami: 71. Baylor: 78. Texas: 63. Kansas: 74. Kansas State: 83. Nebraska: 70. Texas A&M: 51. Texas Tech: 39. Oklahoma State: 64
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 13 by 37.7. BYU: 15 by 45. Unknown: 13 by 66.7. Tulsa: 18 by 48. Miami: 11 by 67.2. Baylor: 21 by 38.5. Texas: 16 by 28.4. Kansas: 23 by 32.2. Kansas State: 15 by 57.6. Nebraska: 15 by 45.5. Texas A&M: 8 by 69.4. Texas Tech: 12 by 34.6. Oklahoma State: 21 by 30.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
69.4 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Stanford | W 31-27 | 12 | 46 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 3.3 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Oklahoma State | W 27-0 | 20 | 58 | 2.90 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3.0 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Texas Tech | L 13-41 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.3 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Texas A&M2+ TD | W 65-10 | 7 | 48 | 6.90 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6.4 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Nebraska | L 3-10 | 12 | 50 | 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Kansas State | W 42-30 | 15 | 83 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Kansas2+ TD | W 35-13 | 22 | 66 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Texas | L 13-16 | 12 | 23 | 1.90 | 0 | 4 | 40 | 3.9 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Baylor2+ TD | W 33-7 | 19 | 70 | 3.70 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3.7 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Miami | L 20-21 | 11 | 71 | 6.50 | 0 | — | — | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Tulsa | W 45-0 | 16 | 73 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 65 | 5.90 | 1 | 2 | 28 | 7.2 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs BYU | L 13-14 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 343 | 41.2 | 25.9 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Oklahoma | 704 | 39.9 | 21.4 | 361 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 704 | 39.9 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma | 1,329 | 59 | 25.1 | 625 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1,329 | 59 | 25.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma | 880 | 46.3 | 26.4 | -449 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 880 | 46.3 | 26.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169
Primary metric
169 scrimmage yards and 46.2 usage.
#2
Kansas State
142
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
142 scrimmage yards and 34.5 usage.
#3
Florida
147
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
147 scrimmage yards and 43.6 usage.
#4
Washington
124
Primary metric
Win with 124 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
124 scrimmage yards and 22.7 usage.
#5
Texas A&M
117
Primary metric
Win with 117 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
117 scrimmage yards and 21.7 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Oklahoma
1,329 primary output · 59 efficiency · 25.1 usage
65.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma
65.3
1,329 primary · 59 efficiency · 25.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Oklahoma
57.6
880 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 26.4 usage
8
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
14
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9494
Alexandria · Alexandria, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,256
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Brown quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit