Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2006-2009Ohio
Taylor Price
WR • 6'1" • Hilliard, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Taylor Price reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
60.4
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ohio
060607080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taylor Price, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Ohio. Taylor Price reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Ohio paired 784 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Ohio
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
56
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
24.6
Consistency
60.4
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 49. UConn: 44. North Texas: 68. Unknown: 135. Tennessee: 90. Bowling Green: 35. Akron: 40. Miami (OH): 14. Kent State: 51. Ball State: 36. Buffalo: 81. Northern Illinois: 45. Temple: 94. Central Michigan: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 4 by 81.7. UConn: 1 by 100. North Texas: 7 by 64.8. Unknown: 9 by 100. Tennessee: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Akron: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 46.7. Kent State: 6 by 56.7. Ball State: 4 by 60. Buffalo: 6 by 90. Northern Illinois: 6 by 50. Temple: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 13.3
Split Comparison
Wins51.6 · n=8 · +4.4 vs Losses
Losses47.2 · n=5 · -4.4 vs Wins
First Half65.9 · n=7 · +19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half46.1 · n=7 · -19.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | vs Marshall | L 17-21 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Central Michigan | L 10-20 | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Temple | W 35-17 | — | 3 | 94 | 25 | 31.30 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-31 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Wed 11/11 | @ Buffalo | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 81 | 14.7 | 13.50 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Ball State | W 20-17 | — | 4 | 36 | 7.8 | 9 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Kent State | L 11-20 | — | 6 | 51 | 7 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Miami (OH) | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Akron | W 19-7 | — | 2 | 40 | 18 | 20 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-37 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Tennessee | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 135 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ North Texas | W 31-30 | — | 7 | 68 | 10.5 | 9.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs UConn | L 16-23 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620062007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Ohio | 77 | 50.5 | 9.5 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Ohio | 77 | 50.5 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ohio | 464 | 83.6 | 17.8 | 387 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio | 694 | 85.8 | 23 | 230 |
| 2009 Postseason | Ohio | 784 | 75.9 | 24.6 | 90 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 784 | 75.9 | 24.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wyoming
139
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 66.2 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Ohio
784 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 24.6 usage
62.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · Ohio
62.9
784 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Ohio
62.3
694 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7889
Hilliard Darby · Hilliard, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,019
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.