Usage Score
34.9
Player Dossier
2006-2009Buffalo
Naaman Roosevelt
WR • 6'0" • Buffalo, NY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Naaman Roosevelt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.5
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Buffalo
0607080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Naaman Roosevelt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Buffalo. Naaman Roosevelt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Buffalo paired 1,402 primary output with 81.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
95.4
Efficiency
78.5
Usage
34.9
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 91. Pittsburgh: 157. UCF: 77. Temple: 120. Central Michigan: 114. Unknown: 46. Akron: 100. Western Michigan: 63. Bowling Green: 21. Ohio: 165
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 100. UCF: 9 by 57. Temple: 9 by 88.9. Central Michigan: 6 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 61.3. Akron: 12 by 55.6. Western Michigan: 8 by 52.5. Bowling Green: 2 by 70. Ohio: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins95.5 · n=2 · -6.9 vs Losses
Losses102.4 · n=7 · +6.9 vs Wins
First Half111.8 · n=5 · +32.8 vs Second Half
Second Half79 · n=5 · -32.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/11 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-27 | — | 8 | 165 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 3 | 76 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Bowling Green | L 29-30 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | L 31-34 | — | 8 | 63 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | W 21-17 | — | 12 | 100 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards | L 13-20 | — | 6 | 114 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Temple100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-37 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ UCFHigh volume | L 17-23 | — | 9 | 77 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 27-54 | — | 6 | 157 | 26.2 | 26.20 | 2 | 67 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ UTEP | W 23-17 | — | 5 | 91 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 1 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 429 | 59 | 16.6 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Buffalo | 766 | 68.8 | 26.1 | 337 |
| 2008 Postseason | Buffalo | 1,402 | 81.3 | 35.1 | 636 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,402 | 81.3 | 35.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 954 | 78.5 | 34.9 | -448 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
165
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami (OH)
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wisconsin
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
148
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Buffalo
1,402 primary output · 81.3 efficiency · 35.1 usage
73.4
#2
2008 Regular Season · Buffalo
73.4
1,402 primary · 81.3 efficiency · 35.1 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
64.9
954 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 34.9 usage
Milestones
14
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
St. Joseph School · Buffalo, NY
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,551
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.