Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2006-2009Penn State
Andrew Quarless
TE • 6'5" • Uniondale, NY, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Andrew Quarless reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.4
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Penn State
0606070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Quarless, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Penn State. Andrew Quarless reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Penn State paired 536 primary output with 78.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.2
Efficiency
78.4
Usage
17.9
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 88. Akron: 12. Syracuse: 35. Temple: 45. Iowa: 35. Illinois: 26. Unknown: 36. Minnesota: 35. Michigan: 91. Northwestern: 25. Ohio State: 7. Indiana: 39. Michigan State: 62
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 8 by 73.3. Akron: 1 by 80. Syracuse: 4 by 58.3. Temple: 3 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 77.8. Illinois: 5 by 34.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 77.8. Michigan: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 83.3. Ohio State: 1 by 46.7. Indiana: 3 by 86.7. Michigan State: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins45.8 · n=10 · +24.8 vs Losses
Losses21 · n=2 · -24.8 vs Wins
First Half39.6 · n=7 · -3.6 vs Second Half
Second Half43.2 · n=6 · +3.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ LSUHigh volume | W 19-17 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Michigan State2+ TD | W 42-14 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Indiana | W 31-20 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Ohio State | L 7-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Northwestern | W 34-13 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Michigan | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 91 | 45.5 | 45.50 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Minnesota | W 20-0 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Illinois | W 35-17 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Iowa | L 10-21 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Temple | W 31-6 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Syracuse | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Akron | W 31-7 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Penn State | 288 | 69.9 | 13.9 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Penn State | 288 | 69.9 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Penn State | 205 | 85.8 | 9.7 | -83 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Penn State | 205 | 85.8 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Penn State | 117 | 66 | 12.5 | -88 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Penn State | 117 | 66 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Penn State | 536 | 78.4 | 17.9 | 419 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 536 | 78.4 | 17.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Penn State
536 primary output · 78.4 efficiency · 17.9 usage
65.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Penn State
65.3
536 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Penn State
53.9
205 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9
Westfield · Chantilly, VA
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,146
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.