Player Dossier

2008-2010

Purdue

Keith Smith

WR • 6'2" • Fort Hood, TX, USA

Alpha targetPossession profile

Keith Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage / Role

44%

Rotational offensive role

lowfeatured

Impact Production

100

Top-tier box-score impact for a receiver

lowelite

Reliability

81

Regular contributor with several takeover games

lowhigh

Star Power

85

Elite ceiling indicators

limitedstar

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue

080910

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Unique Seasons
3
Program Path
Purdue
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Player Story

Keith Smith built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a wide receiver from Fort Hood, TX wearing No. 8, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Keith Smith's career was his receiving role: 158...

Read the story

Keith Smith, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue. Keith Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,709
Receptions
158
Touchdowns
9

Quick Answers

Keith Smith quick answers

Latest team and position
Purdue · WR
Career Receiving Yards
1,709
Tracked sample
3 unique seasons · 3 entries · 26 games
Best season
2009 Regular Season · Purdue
Top game
Minnesota
Latest roster
No. 8 · Class 2010
2010 Receiving yards rank
123 receiving yards · WR 499th (top 62%) · Big Ten 69th (top 43%) · National 732nd (top 43%)

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonPurdue1249486251
2009 Regular SeasonPurdue12911,100788.2
2010 Regular SeasonPurdue218123057.6

Related Context

Keith Smith played WR for Purdue. Across 3 tracked seasons, Keith Smith recorded 15 passing yards, 10 rushing yards, and 1,709 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Purdue.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Purdue paired 1,100 primary output with 79 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 79 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Purdue

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

91.7

Efficiency

79

Usage

32.2

Consistency

74

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 117. Oregon: 68. Northern Illinois: 37. Notre Dame: 136. Northwestern: 101. Minnesota: 126. Ohio State: 125. Illinois: 61. Wisconsin: 8. Michigan: 84. Michigan State: 152. Indiana: 85

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 8 by 97.5. Oregon: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 5 by 49.3. Notre Dame: 11 by 82.4. Northwestern: 7 by 96.2. Minnesota: 7 by 100. Ohio State: 12 by 69.4. Illinois: 5 by 81.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Michigan: 11 by 50.9. Michigan State: 15 by 67.6. Indiana: 5 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins94.4 · Games = 5 · +4.7 vs Losses
Losses89.7 · Games = 7 · -4.7 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Minnesota

Best efficiency game

100 vs Indiana

Result
Sat 11/21@ IndianaW 38-215851717135
Sat 11/14vs Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volumeL 37-401515210.110.10126
Sat 11/7@ MichiganHigh volumeW 38-3611847.67.60014
Sat 10/31@ WisconsinL 0-37188808
Sat 10/24vs IllinoisW 24-1456112.212.20022
Sat 10/17vs Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volumeW 26-181212510.410.40023
Sat 10/10@ Minnesota100 receiving yardsL 20-3571261818161
Sat 10/3vs Northwestern100 receiving yardsL 21-27710114.414.40123
Sun 9/27vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volumeL 21-241113611.812.40128
Sat 9/19vs Northern IllinoisL 21-285377.47.40016
Sun 9/13@ OregonL 36-384681717024
Sat 9/5vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volumeW 52-31811714.614.60134

Player Story

Keith Smith story

Keith Smith built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a wide receiver from Fort Hood, TX wearing No. 8, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Keith Smith's career was his receiving role: 158 catches, 1,709 receiving yards, 8 touchdowns, and 10 rushing yards across 26 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with Purdue. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.

The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 15 passing yards, 10 rushing yards, and 4 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 26 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Purdue.

The arc is straightforward: Keith Smith moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Purdue

    2008-2010

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

200820092010
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2008 Regular SeasonPurdue48661.416.9
2009 Regular SeasonPurdue1,1007932.2614
2010 Regular SeasonPurdue12346.131.9-977

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

@ Minnesota

Week 6 · L 20-35 · Conference game

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

126

Receiving Yards

92.1 takeover

126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

vs Toledo

Week 1 · W 52-31

117

Receiving Yards

91.5 takeover

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.

#3

vs Indiana

Week 13 · W 62-10 · Conference game

136

Receiving Yards

91.1 takeover

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

136 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.

#4

vs Notre Dame

Week 4 · L 21-24

136

Receiving Yards

90.6 takeover

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

136 receiving yards with a 82.4 efficiency score.

#5

vs Michigan State

Week 11 · L 37-40 · Conference game

152

Receiving Yards

89.2 takeover

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

152 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2009 Regular Season · Purdue

1,100 primary output · 79 efficiency · 32.2 usage

88.2

#2

2010 Regular Season · Purdue

57.6

123 primary · 46.1 efficiency · 31.9 usage

#3

2008 Regular Season · Purdue

51

486 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 16.9 usage

Milestones

7

100+ receiving yards

7

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games