Usage Score
50.7
Player Dossier
2006-2009Stanford
RB • 6'1" • Norco, CA, USA
Toby Gerhart leans workhorse runner traits and 57.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
50.7
Efficiency
57.9
Consistency
77.8
Season Value
71.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Toby Gerhart, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Stanford. Toby Gerhart leans workhorse runner traits and 57.9 efficiency.
Toby Gerhart played RB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Toby Gerhart recorded 18 passing yards, 3,522 rushing yards, and 395 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Stanford paired 2,028 primary output with 57.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
156
Efficiency
57.9
Usage
50.7
Consistency
77.8
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 143. Washington State: 121. Wake Forest: 94. San José State: 121. Washington: 200. UCLA: 158. Oregon State: 107. Arizona: 141. Arizona State: 130. Oregon: 223. USC: 187. California: 165. Notre Dame: 238
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 33 by 44.4. Washington State: 23 by 54.8. Wake Forest: 18 by 51.9. San José State: 25 by 49.6. Washington: 27 by 77.2. UCLA: 31 by 50.1. Oregon State: 21 by 51.2. Arizona: 29 by 47.7. Arizona State: 28 by 48.3. Oregon: 38 by 61.1. USC: 30 by 64.3. California: 21 by 75.2. Notre Dame: 30 by 77.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
77.2 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs Oklahoma100 rush yards | L 27-31 | 32 | 135 | 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.3 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Notre Dame100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-38 | 29 | 205 | 7.10 | 3 | 1 | 33 | 7.9 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs California100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 28-34 | 20 | 136 | 6.80 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ USC100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 55-21 | 29 | 178 | 6.10 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6.2 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Oregon100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 51-42 | 38 | 223 | 5.90 | 3 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Arizona State100 rush yards | W 33-14 | 27 | 125 | 4.60 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Arizona100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 38-43 | 28 | 123 | 4.40 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Oregon State2+ TD | L 28-38 | 20 | 96 | 4.80 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs UCLA100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 24-16 | 29 | 134 | 4.60 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 5.1 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Washington100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-14 | 27 | 200 | 7.40 | 1 | — | — | 7.4 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs San José State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 42-17 | 24 | 113 | 4.70 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Wake Forest | L 17-24 | 17 | 82 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Washington State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 39-13 | 23 | 121 | 5.30 | 2 | — | — | 5.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Stanford | 499 | 38.5 | 22.1 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Stanford | 140 | 98.6 | 18.5 | -359 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 1,250 | 58.1 | 35.3 | 1,110 |
| 2009 Postseason | Stanford | 2,028 | 57.9 | 50.7 | 778 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 2,028 | 57.9 | 50.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
238
Primary metric
238 scrimmage yards and 47.6 usage.
#2
San José State
140
Primary metric
Win with 140 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
140 scrimmage yards and 18.5 usage.
#3
San José State
151
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
151 scrimmage yards and 46.9 usage.
#4
Oregon
223
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
223 scrimmage yards and 59.4 usage.
#5
Oregon State
147
Primary metric
Win with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 34.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Stanford
2,028 primary output · 57.9 efficiency · 50.7 usage
71.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Stanford
71.6
2,028 primary · 57.9 efficiency · 50.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Stanford
59.3
1,250 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 35.3 usage
21
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8083
Warner Robins · Warner Robins, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,917
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.