Usage Score
17.3
Player Dossier
2008-2010Ohio
Steven Goulet
WR • 6'2" • Irmo, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Steven Goulet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
45.2
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio
0809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Steven Goulet, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Ohio. Steven Goulet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Ohio paired 388 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Ohio
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
32.3
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
17.3
Consistency
45.2
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 40. Unknown: 21. Toledo: 8. Marshall: 28. Eastern Michigan: 45. Bowling Green: 33. Akron: 25. Miami (OH): 12. Louisiana: 126. Buffalo: 37. Temple: 0. Kent State: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 2 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 70. Toledo: 2 by 26.7. Marshall: 2 by 93.3. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 75. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Akron: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 80. Louisiana: 5 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins39.7 · n=7 · +17.5 vs Losses
Losses22.3 · n=4 · -17.5 vs Wins
First Half29.2 · n=6 · -6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half35.5 · n=6 · +6.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Troy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/19 | @ Troy | L 21-48 | — | 2 | 40 | 11.8 | 20 | 1 | 34 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ Kent State | L 6-28 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Temple | W 31-23 | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/4 | vs Buffalo | W 34-17 | — | 2 | 37 | 12.7 | 18.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisiana100 receiving yards | W 38-31 | — | 5 | 126 | 25.2 | 25.20 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Miami (OH) | W 34-13 | — | 1 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Akron | W 38-10 | — | 1 | 25 | 21.3 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Bowling Green | W 49-25 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 30-17 | — | 4 | 45 | 13.6 | 11.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Marshall | L 23-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Toledo | L 13-20 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio | 189 | 80 | 7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Ohio | 230 | 66.4 | 11.7 | 41 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 230 | 66.4 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 388 | 80.8 | 17.3 | 158 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 388 | 80.8 | 17.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
37
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Ohio
388 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 17.3 usage
58.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ohio
58.9
388 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Ohio
46.5
189 primary · 80 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
Dutch Fork · Irmo, SC
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
807
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.