Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2010Minnesota
QB • 6'3" • Shoreview, MN, USA
Adam Weber is a balanced quarterback profile with 14 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
72%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
39
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
34
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Player Story
Adam Weber built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a quarterback from Shoreview, MN wearing No. 8, spending time with Minnesota. The clearest part of Adam Weber's career was his passing role: 10,917...
Read the storyAdam Weber, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota. Adam Weber is a balanced quarterback profile with 14 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint

Featured Highlight
Adam Weber Minnesota Highlights
2010 · Minnesota · Player Highlight
Adam Weber college highlights at Minnesota.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 3,512 | 2,895 | 617 | 29 | 78.7 |
| 2008 Postseason | Minnesota | 13 | 207 | 176 | 31 | 1 | 73.1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 13 | 2,787 | 2,585 | 202 | 18 | 73.1 |
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 13 | 263 | 261 | 2 | 1 | 56.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 13 | 2,186 | 2,321 | -135 | 13 | 56.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 2,835 | 2,679 | 156 | 20 | 63.2 |
Related Context
Adam Weber played QB for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, Adam Weber recorded 10,917 passing yards, 873 rushing yards, and 9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 3,512 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 48.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 411 yards of offense and 62.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
188.4
Efficiency
48.4
Usage
17.1
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 263. Syracuse: 240. Air Force: 221. California: 207. Northwestern: 185. Wisconsin: 244. Purdue: 90. Penn State: 111. Ohio State: 104. Michigan State: 411. Illinois: 157. South Dakota State: 82. Iowa: 134
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 36 by 54.2. Syracuse: 45 by 46.2. Air Force: 31 by 60.5. California: 36 by 46.7. Northwestern: 31 by 50.5. Wisconsin: 35 by 53.8. Purdue: 18 by 38.2. Penn State: 26 by 47.6. Ohio State: 28 by 37.3. Michigan State: 35 by 62.1. Illinois: 38 by 48.7. South Dakota State: 32 by 41.5. Iowa: 49 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
62.1 vs Michigan State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Iowa State | L 13-14 | 18 | 32 | 261 | 56.3 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Iowa | L 0-12 | 14 | 40 | 153 | 35.0 | 0 | 0 | 41.7 | 9 | -19 | -2.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs South Dakota State | W 16-13 | 10 | 21 | 94 | 47.6 | 0 | 1 | 41.5 | 11 | -12 | -1.10 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Illinois | L 32-35 | 14 | 30 | 221 | 46.7 | 1 | 1 | 48.7 | 8 | -64 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 42-34 | 19 | 31 | 416 | 61.3 | 5 | 1 | 62.1 | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Ohio State | L 7-38 | 10 | 23 | 112 | 43.5 | 0 | 2 | 37.3 | 5 | -8 | -1.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Penn State | L 0-20 | 10 | 22 | 101 | 45.5 | 0 | 1 | 47.6 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Purdue | W 35-20 | 5 | 9 | 74 | 55.6 | 0 | 2 | 38.2 | 9 | 16 | 1.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Wisconsin | L 28-31 | 16 | 30 | 271 | 53.3 | 1 | 1 | 53.8 | 5 | -27 | -5.40 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Northwestern | W 35-24 | 15 | 26 | 186 | 57.7 | 2 | 1 | 50.5 | 5 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs California | L 21-35 | 21 | 32 | 226 | 65.6 | 2 | 3 | 46.7 | 4 | -19 | -4.80 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Air Force | W 20-13 | 20 | 29 | 219 | 69.0 | 0 | 0 | 60.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Syracuse | W 23-20 | 19 | 42 | 248 | 45.2 | 1 | 1 | 46.2 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 0 |
Player Story
Adam Weber built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a quarterback from Shoreview, MN wearing No. 8, spending time with Minnesota. The clearest part of Adam Weber's career was his passing role: 10,917 passing yards, 72 touchdown passes, 1,594 attempts, and 873 rushing yards across 50 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2007 with Minnesota. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 873 rushing yards and 9 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 50 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Minnesota.
The arc is straightforward: Adam Weber moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Minnesota | 3,512 | 58.3 | 33.6 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Minnesota | 2,994 | 58.1 | 31.4 | -518 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,994 | 58.1 | 31.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 2,449 | 48.4 | 17.1 | -545 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,449 | 48.4 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,835 | 61.6 | 14 | 386 |
#1 Featured game
vs Wisconsin
Week 12 · L 34-41 · Conference game
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
439
Total Offense
87.8 takeover
439 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#2
vs Northern Illinois
Week 4 · L 23-34
373
Total Offense
87.7 takeover
Loss with 373 yards of offense and 75.4 efficiency.
373 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#3
vs Northwestern
Week 10 · L 17-24 · Conference game
380
Total Offense
86.6 takeover
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
380 total offense with 59.9 efficiency.
#4
@ Northwestern
Week 7 · L 48-49 · Conference game
430
Total Offense
79.6 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
430 total offense with 72 efficiency.
#5
vs Northern Illinois
Week 1 · W 31-27
328
Total Offense
78.8 takeover
Win with 328 yards of offense and 64.2 efficiency.
328 total offense with 64.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
3,512 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 33.6 usage
78.7
#2
2008 Postseason · Minnesota
73.1
2,994 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 31.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Minnesota
73.1
2,994 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 31.4 usage
14
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
10
3+ TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.