Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2008-2010Wisconsin
Lance Kendricks
TE • 6'4" • Milwaukee, WI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Lance Kendricks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Wisconsin
0809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lance Kendricks, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Wisconsin. Lance Kendricks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 663 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55.3
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
22.7
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 36. UNLV: 5. San José State: 60. Arizona State: 131. Unknown: 103. Michigan State: 17. Minnesota: 75. Iowa: 26. Purdue: 9. Indiana: 47. Michigan: 74. Northwestern: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 4 by 60. UNLV: 1 by 33.3. San José State: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 7 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 37.8. Minnesota: 5 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 86.7. Purdue: 1 by 60. Indiana: 3 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins56.3 · n=9 · +29.8 vs Losses
Losses26.5 · n=2 · -29.8 vs Wins
First Half58.7 · n=6 · +6.8 vs Second Half
Second Half51.8 · n=6 · -6.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ TCU | L 19-21 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Northwestern | W 70-23 | — | 4 | 80 | 14.8 | 20 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Michigan | W 48-28 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Indiana | W 83-20 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Purdue | W 34-13 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Iowa | W 31-30 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Minnesota | W 41-23 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Michigan State | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 103 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards | W 20-19 | — | 7 | 131 | 15.9 | 18.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs San José State | W 27-14 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ UNLV | W 41-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 141 | 80 | 10.8 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Wisconsin | 356 | 66 | 16.4 | 215 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 356 | 66 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Wisconsin | 663 | 81.5 | 22.7 | 307 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 663 | 81.5 | 22.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
103
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northwestern
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Wisconsin
663 primary output · 81.5 efficiency · 22.7 usage
66.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Wisconsin
66.7
663 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Wisconsin
44.1
356 primary · 66 efficiency · 16.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9323
King · Milwaukee, WI
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,160
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.