Player Stats

Jacob Ramsey College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,744
Rushing yards
1,469
Receiving yards
275
Touchdowns
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 Regular SeasonCincinnati1440036.8
2007 PostseasonCincinnati11990050.8
2007 Regular SeasonCincinnati1138835335350.8
2008 PostseasonCincinnati1440346071
2008 Regular SeasonCincinnati1471963089371
2009 PostseasonCincinnati11341816054.8
2009 Regular SeasonCincinnati11550421129654.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 759 primary output with 51.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 53 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

53.1

Efficiency

53

Usage

16.3

Consistency

42.5

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 34. Rutgers: 110. Southeast Missouri State: 89. Oregon State: 30. Fresno State: 34. Miami (OH): 102. South Florida: 21. Louisville: 20. Syracuse: 33. UConn: 109. Pittsburgh: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 8 by 36.5. Rutgers: 10 by 95.8. Southeast Missouri State: 9 by 91.2. Oregon State: 7 by 41.6. Fresno State: 6 by 45.5. Miami (OH): 13 by 82.7. South Florida: 10 by 18.9. Louisville: 4 by 41.7. Syracuse: 8 by 41.3. UConn: 15 by 77.7. Pittsburgh: 2 by 10.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins55 · Games = 10 · +21 vs Losses
Losses34 · Games = 1 · -21 vs Wins