Usage Score
29.3
Player Dossier
2006-2010Florida
Jarred Fayson
WR • 6'0" • Tampa, FL, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Jarred Fayson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
56.7
Consistency
59.1
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Illinois
0607091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Florida • Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarred Fayson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Illinois. Jarred Fayson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Illinois paired 355 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Illinois
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
35.5
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
29.3
Consistency
59.1
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 31. Missouri: 20. Unknown: 16. Northern Illinois: 10. Ohio State: 83. Penn State: 32. Michigan State: 45. Indiana: 33. Michigan: 79. Fresno State: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 4 by 51.7. Missouri: 4 by 33.3. Unknown: 2 by 53.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 33.3. Ohio State: 8 by 69.2. Penn State: 4 by 53.3. Michigan State: 5 by 60. Indiana: 3 by 73.3. Michigan: 5 by 100. Fresno State: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins26.5 · n=4 · -20.1 vs Losses
Losses46.6 · n=5 · +20.1 vs Wins
First Half32 · n=5 · -7 vs Second Half
Second Half39 · n=5 · +7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/29 | @ Baylor | W 38-14 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Fresno State | L 23-25 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Michigan | L 65-67 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Indiana | W 43-13 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Michigan State | L 6-26 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Penn State | W 33-13 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio StateHigh volume | L 13-24 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northern Illinois | W 28-22 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Missouri | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida
2006-2007
Opening stop
- 2
Illinois
2009-2010
Final stop
Season Progression
20062007200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Florida | 1 | 60 | 2 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Florida | 148 | 63.1 | 10.3 | 147 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Illinois | 218 | 68.8 | 13.5 | 70 |
| 2010 Postseason | Illinois | 355 | 56.7 | 29.3 | 137 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Illinois | 355 | 56.7 | 29.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 69.2 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Illinois
355 primary output · 56.7 efficiency · 29.3 usage
61.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Illinois
61.3
355 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 29.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Illinois
49.6
218 primary · 68.8 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9526
Hillsborough · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
722
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.