Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Penn State paired 3,214 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | 164 | 116 | 48 | 3 | 29.7 |
| 2007 Postseason | Penn State | 6 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 31.9 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | 59 | 31 | 28 | 1 | 31.9 |
| 2008 Postseason | Penn State | 13 | 290 | 273 | 17 | 3 | 68.2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Penn State | 13 | 2,584 | 2,319 | 265 | 26 | 68.2 |
| 2009 Postseason | Penn State | 13 | 236 | 216 | 20 | 1 | 71.9 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 13 | 2,978 | 2,787 | 191 | 30 | 71.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Penn State paired 3,214 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with 290 yards of offense and 67.8 efficiency. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
247.2
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
18.3
Consistency
86.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 236. Akron: 358. Syracuse: 239. Temple: 161. Iowa: 217. Illinois: 258. Eastern Illinois: 245. Minnesota: 295. Michigan: 243. Northwestern: 290. Ohio State: 145. Indiana: 223. Michigan State: 304
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 46 by 55.3. Akron: 43 by 63.2. Syracuse: 33 by 54. Temple: 28 by 49.9. Iowa: 41 by 43.2. Illinois: 32 by 81.6. Eastern Illinois: 23 by 68.7. Minnesota: 40 by 62.6. Michigan: 34 by 62.2. Northwestern: 37 by 67.8. Ohio State: 39 by 46. Indiana: 35 by 57.8. Michigan State: 34 by 66.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.