Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2006-2010Florida Atlantic
TE • 6'5" • Converse, TX, USA
Rob Housler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.8
Efficiency
85.1
Consistency
72.8
Season Value
68.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rob Housler, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic. Rob Housler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Florida Atlantic paired 629 primary output with 85.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
52.4
Efficiency
85.1
Usage
20.8
Consistency
72.8
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 29. Michigan State: 75. North Texas: 94. South Florida: 18. UL Monroe: 78. Arkansas State: 63. Florida International: 10. Western Kentucky: 31. Louisiana: 73. Texas: 64. Middle Tennessee: 42. Troy: 52
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 96.7. Michigan State: 7 by 71.4. North Texas: 4 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 40. UL Monroe: 6 by 86.7. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. Louisiana: 3 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 93.3. Troy: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Troy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/4 | vs Troy | L 7-44 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Texas2+ TD | L 17-51 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 2 | 56 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Louisiana | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Western Kentucky | W 17-16 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Florida International | W 21-9 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Arkansas State | L 16-37 | — | 2 | 63 | 30.7 | 31.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ UL Monroe | L 17-20 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ South Florida | L 3-31 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs North Texas | L 17-21 | — | 4 | 94 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Michigan State | L 17-30 | — | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ UAB | W 32-31 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Florida Atlantic
2006-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 16 | 53.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Florida Atlantic | 64 | 77.1 | 8.2 | 48 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 64 | 77.1 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Florida Atlantic | 519 | 81.7 | 14.1 | 455 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 519 | 81.7 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 0 | — | — | -519 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 629 | 85.1 | 20.8 | 629 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Primary metric
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
629 primary output · 85.1 efficiency · 20.8 usage
68.4
#2
2008 Postseason · Florida Atlantic
61.5
519 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
61.5
519 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 14.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7
Judson · Converse, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,228
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Rob Housler quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit