Usage Score
19.4
Player Dossier
2008-2010UCF
Jamar Newsome
WR • 6'2" • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jamar Newsome reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.5
Consistency
34.1
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UCF
0809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCF
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamar Newsome, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UCF. Jamar Newsome reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UCF paired 616 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · UCF
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
44
Efficiency
78.5
Usage
19.4
Consistency
34.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 19. Unknown: 14. NC State: 29. Buffalo: 15. Kansas State: 9. UAB: 68. Marshall: 18. Rice: 16. East Carolina: 37. Houston: 123. Southern Miss: 100. Tulane: 20. Memphis: 118. SMU: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 3 by 42.2. Unknown: 1 by 93.3. NC State: 1 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 50. Kansas State: 1 by 60. UAB: 3 by 100. Marshall: 2 by 60. Rice: 4 by 26.7. East Carolina: 2 by 100. Houston: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 100. SMU: 3 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins46.4 · n=10 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses46 · n=3 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half24.6 · n=7 · -38.9 vs Second Half
Second Half63.4 · n=7 · +38.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Georgia | W 10-6 | — | 3 | 19 | 4.8 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs SMU | W 17-7 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 37-17 | — | 4 | 118 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 2 | 56 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulane | W 61-14 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Southern Miss100 receiving yards | L 21-31 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Houston100 receiving yards | W 40-33 | — | 5 | 123 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs East Carolina | W 49-35 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Rice | W 41-14 | — | 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 10/14 | @ Marshall | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 10/7 | vs UAB | W 42-7 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Kansas State | L 13-17 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Buffalo | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs NC State | L 21-28 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 14 | 9.7 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCF
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UCF | 81 | 73.3 | 13.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | UCF | 289 | 68.3 | 17.4 | 208 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCF | 289 | 68.3 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | UCF | 616 | 78.5 | 19.4 | 327 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UCF | 616 | 78.5 | 19.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · UCF
616 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 19.4 usage
58
#2
2010 Regular Season · UCF
58
616 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · UCF
45.9
289 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
Boca Ciega · St. Petersburg, FL
- Committed To
- UCF
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
986
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.