Player Stats

Glenis Thompson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
415
Rushing yards
397
Receiving yards
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonWestern Michigan6990038.7
2006 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan676760038.7
2007 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan91351278151.5
2008 PostseasonWestern Michigan6220025.9
2008 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan645450025.9
2009 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan714813810152.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 148 primary output with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 55 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Western Michigan

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

21.1

Efficiency

48.1

Usage

7.3

Consistency

42

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 7. Miami (OH): 55. Northern Illinois: 3. Toledo: 45. Buffalo: 21. Michigan State: 16. Ball State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 25.3. Miami (OH): 9 by 63.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 25. Toledo: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 3 by 79.2. Michigan State: 5 by 33.3. Ball State: 1 by 10.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.3 · Games = 3 · +33.6 vs Losses
Losses6.8 · Games = 4 · -33.6 vs Wins