Player Stats

Donovan Potter College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
135
Receptions
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)4974065.2
2008 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)7961054.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season

Miami (OH) paired 74 primary output with 63.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2008 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 49.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2008 Regular Season · Miami (OH)

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

8.7

Efficiency

49.1

Usage

5.5

Consistency

68.6

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 6. Northern Illinois: 10. Kent State: 13. Buffalo: 14. Ball State: 5. Toledo: 1. Ohio: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 1 by 40. Northern Illinois: 1 by 66.7. Kent State: 1 by 86.7. Buffalo: 2 by 46.7. Ball State: 2 by 16.7. Toledo: 1 by 6.7. Ohio: 1 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half10.8 · Games = 4 · +4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half6 · Games = 3 · -4.8 vs First Half