Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2006-2008SMU
WR • 6'1" • 165 lbs • Flower Mound, TX, USA
Zach Zimmerman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
26
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
25
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
29
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Zach Zimmerman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · SMU. Zach Zimmerman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 39.2 |
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 4 | 8 | 130 | 0 | 72.7 |
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 3 | 7 | 89 | 0 | 65.8 |
Related Context
Zach Zimmerman played WR for SMU. Across 3 tracked seasons, Zach Zimmerman recorded 224 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2007 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
SMU paired 130 primary output with 87.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
29.7
Efficiency
78.3
Usage
13.9
Consistency
70
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 8. UTEP: 49. Southern Miss: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 1 by 53.3. UTEP: 4 by 81.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | SMU | 5 | 33.3 | 5.9 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 130 | 87.2 | 8.5 | 125 |
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 89 | 78.3 | 13.9 | -41 |
#1 Featured game
@ UTEP
Week 12 · L 10-36 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Receiving Yards
93.9 takeover
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs UCF
Week 12 · L 20-49 · Conference game
49
Receiving Yards
85.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Memphis
Week 13 · L 52-55 · Conference game
43
Receiving Yards
70.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
vs Southern Miss
Week 14 · L 12-28 · Conference game
32
Receiving Yards
63.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Houston
Week 10 · L 28-38 · Conference game
30
Receiving Yards
59.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Regular Season · SMU
130 primary output · 87.2 efficiency · 8.5 usage
72.7
#2
2008 Regular Season · SMU
65.8
89 primary · 78.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · SMU
39.2
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.