Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2007-2010Memphis
TE • 6'8" • Maylene, AL, USA
Deven Onarheim reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.9
Efficiency
56
Consistency
70.6
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deven Onarheim, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis. Deven Onarheim reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Memphis paired 135 primary output with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
16.9
Efficiency
56
Usage
15.9
Consistency
70.6
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 3. UTEP: 33. Tulsa: 16. Southern Miss: 21. Houston: 9. Marshall: 21. UAB: 20. UCF: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 20. UTEP: 3 by 73.3. Tulsa: 2 by 53.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 70. Houston: 1 by 60. Marshall: 1 by 100. UAB: 3 by 44.4. UCF: 3 by 26.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Memphis
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Memphis | 10 | 66.7 | 3.8 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Memphis | 34 | 40 | 13.1 | 24 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Memphis | 34 | 40 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 82 | 56.9 | 8.5 | 48 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Memphis | 135 | 56 | 15.9 | 53 |
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23
Primary metric
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
10
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
26
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
135 primary output · 56 efficiency · 15.9 usage
60.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
46.1
82 primary · 56.9 efficiency · 8.5 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Memphis
44.4
10 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 3.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7444
Thompson · Alabaster, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
261
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Deven Onarheim quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit