Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2006-2010Marshall
Courtney Edmonson
WR • Titusville, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Courtney Edmonson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.4
Consistency
59.7
Season Value
59.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Marshall
0607080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Marshall
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Courtney Edmonson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Marshall. Courtney Edmonson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Marshall paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
33.1
Efficiency
67.4
Usage
14.5
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 26. West Virginia: 28. Ohio: 2. UCF: 32. East Carolina: 17. UAB: 59. Memphis: 16. SMU: 53. Tulane: 65
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 1 by 100. West Virginia: 3 by 62.2. Ohio: 1 by 13.3. UCF: 3 by 71.1. East Carolina: 3 by 37.8. UAB: 4 by 98.3. Memphis: 3 by 35.6. SMU: 4 by 88.3. Tulane: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins35.5 · n=4 · +4.3 vs Losses
Losses31.2 · n=5 · -4.3 vs Wins
First Half21 · n=5 · -27.3 vs Second Half
Second Half48.3 · n=4 · +27.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Tulane | W 38-23 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ SMU | L 17-31 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Memphis | W 28-13 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UAB | W 31-17 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ East Carolina | L 10-37 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/14 | vs UCF | L 14-35 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Ohio | W 24-23 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fri 9/10 | vs West Virginia | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 28 | 8 | 9.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Thu 9/2 | @ Ohio State | L 7-45 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Marshall
2006-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Marshall | 104 | 92 | 9.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Marshall | 276 | 71.4 | 10.4 | 172 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Marshall | 55 | 60.7 | 7.6 | -221 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Marshall | 0 | — | — | -55 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Marshall | 298 | 67.4 | 14.5 | 298 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Marshall
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
59.8
298 primary · 67.4 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Marshall
53.4
276 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7
Astronaut · Titusville, FL
- Committed To
- Marshall
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
733
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.