Player Stats

Javarris James College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,665
Rushing yards
2,162
Receiving yards
503
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonMiami13623527076.4
2006 Regular SeasonMiami13940767173576.4
2007 Regular SeasonMiami12682582100462
2008 PostseasonMiami9633048
2008 Regular SeasonMiami9398283115448
2009 PostseasonMiami11312054.7
2009 Regular SeasonMiami1157449183654.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason

Miami paired 1,002 primary output with 48.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma

Win with 154 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Miami

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

52.5

Efficiency

45.7

Usage

20

Consistency

58.5

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 3. Florida State: 71. Georgia Tech: 84. Virginia Tech: 35. Oklahoma: 154. Florida A&M: 7. UCF: 65. Clemson: 56. Virginia: 11. Duke: 52. South Florida: 39

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 6 by 3.6. Florida State: 14 by 41.6. Georgia Tech: 16 by 54. Virginia Tech: 14 by 26. Oklahoma: 16 by 90.1. Florida A&M: 2 by 39.6. UCF: 17 by 39.8. Clemson: 6 by 88.9. Virginia: 2 by 41.7. Duke: 11 by 42.6. South Florida: 12 by 34.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins60.4 · Games = 8 · +29.0 vs Losses
Losses31.3 · Games = 3 · -29.0 vs Wins