Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2006-2009LSU
Richard Dickson
TE • 6'3" • Ocean Springs, MS, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Richard Dickson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
46.5
Consistency
46.1
Season Value
38.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · LSU
06070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richard Dickson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · LSU. Richard Dickson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Richard Dickson played TE for LSU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Richard Dickson recorded 952 receiving yards and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2007 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
LSU paired 375 primary output with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · LSU
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
46.5
Usage
13.1
Consistency
46.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 7. Washington: 9. Vanderbilt: 14. Louisiana: 27. Mississippi State: 14. Georgia: 31. Florida: 8. Tulane: 5. Ole Miss: -2. Arkansas: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 1 by 46.7. Washington: 1 by 60. Vanderbilt: 2 by 46.7. Louisiana: 3 by 60. Mississippi State: 2 by 46.7. Georgia: 3 by 68.9. Florida: 1 by 53.3. Tulane: 1 by 33.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 0. Arkansas: 6 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20.6 · Games = 7 · +16.2 vs Losses
Losses4.3 · Games = 3 · -16.2 vs Wins
First Half14.2 · Games = 5 · -3 vs Second Half
Second Half17.2 · Games = 5 · +3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
68.9 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Penn State | L 17-19 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Arkansas | W 33-30 | — | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Ole Miss | L 23-25 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Tulane | W 42-0 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs Florida | L 3-13 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Georgia | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Mississippi State | W 30-26 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Louisiana | W 31-3 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Vanderbilt | W 23-9 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Washington | W 31-23 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | LSU | 96 | 66.7 | 6 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | LSU | 375 | 77 | 17.5 | 279 |
| 2007 Regular Season | LSU | 375 | 77 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | LSU | 324 | 71.7 | 16.8 | -51 |
| 2008 Regular Season | LSU | 324 | 71.7 | 16.8 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | LSU | 157 | 46.5 | 13.1 | -167 |
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 157 | 46.5 | 13.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Tech
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#5
Alabama
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · LSU
375 primary output · 77 efficiency · 17.5 usage
65.9
#2
2007 Regular Season · LSU
65.9
375 primary · 77 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · LSU
62.6
324 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 16.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9687
Ocean Springs · Pascagoula, MS
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
952
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.