Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2006-2009Pittsburgh
Dorin Dickerson
TE • 6'2" • Imperial, PA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Dorin Dickerson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.1
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
060708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dorin Dickerson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Dorin Dickerson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 529 primary output with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
44.1
Efficiency
67.1
Usage
24.3
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 21. Unknown: 26. Buffalo: 71. Navy: 6. NC State: 52. Louisville: 50. UConn: 27. Rutgers: 42. South Florida: 58. Syracuse: 118. Notre Dame: 46. West Virginia: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 4 by 35. Unknown: 4 by 43.3. Buffalo: 8 by 59.2. Navy: 1 by 40. NC State: 4 by 86.7. Louisville: 3 by 100. UConn: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 6 by 46.7. South Florida: 5 by 77.3. Syracuse: 7 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 76.7. West Virginia: 2 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins48.8 · n=9 · +16.8 vs Losses
Losses32 · n=2 · -16.8 vs Wins
First Half37.7 · n=6 · -12.8 vs Second Half
Second Half50.5 · n=6 · +12.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/26 | @ North Carolina | W 19-17 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ West Virginia | L 16-19 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Notre Dame | W 27-22 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Syracuse100 receiving yards | W 37-10 | — | 7 | 118 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs South Florida | W 41-14 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Rutgers | W 24-17 | — | 6 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs UConn | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Louisville2+ TD | W 35-10 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ NC State | L 31-38 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Navy | W 27-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ BuffaloHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 54-27 | — | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 3 | 23 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 5 | 33.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | -5 |
| 2008 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 174 | 70 | 8.4 | 174 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 174 | 70 | 8.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 529 | 67.1 | 24.3 | 355 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 529 | 67.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Louisville
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
529 primary output · 67.1 efficiency · 24.3 usage
63.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
63.9
529 primary · 67.1 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Pittsburgh
39.2
174 primary · 70 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.9759
West Allegheny · Imperial, PA
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
708
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.