Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2007-2010TCU
Jimmy Young
WR • 6'1" • Monroe, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jimmy Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.3
Consistency
74.6
Season Value
56.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · TCU
0707080809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jimmy Young, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · TCU. Jimmy Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
TCU paired 988 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · TCU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.5
Efficiency
85.3
Usage
15.6
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 57. Unknown: 17. Baylor: 53. SMU: 9. Colorado State: 39. Wyoming: 8. BYU: 40. Air Force: 38. UNLV: 43. Utah: 84. San Diego State: 44. New Mexico: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 5 by 76. Unknown: 1 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 100. SMU: 1 by 60. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 53.3. BYU: 3 by 88.9. Air Force: 2 by 100. UNLV: 4 by 71.7. Utah: 5 by 100. San Diego State: 4 by 73.3. New Mexico: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins42.6 · n=11
First Half30.5 · n=6 · -20 vs Second Half
Second Half50.5 · n=6 · +20 vs First Half
All Games40.5 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-19 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ New Mexico | W 66-17 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs San Diego State | W 40-35 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Utah | W 47-7 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 30 |
| Sun 10/31 | @ UNLV | W 48-6 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Air Force | W 38-7 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs BYU | W 31-3 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Wyoming | W 45-0 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Colorado State | W 27-0 | — | 1 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ SMU | W 41-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Baylor | W 45-10 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072007200820082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | TCU | 325 | 69.8 | 11.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | TCU | 325 | 69.8 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | TCU | 988 | 85.9 | 29 | 663 |
| 2008 Regular Season | TCU | 988 | 85.9 | 29 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | TCU | 517 | 87.7 | 17.6 | -471 |
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 517 | 87.7 | 17.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | TCU | 486 | 85.3 | 15.6 | -31 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 486 | 85.3 | 15.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
226
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
226 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · TCU
988 primary output · 85.9 efficiency · 29 usage
67.5
#2
2008 Regular Season · TCU
67.5
988 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 29 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · TCU
56.8
486 primary · 85.3 efficiency · 15.6 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7444
Ouachita Parish · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,316
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.