Usage Score
19.6
Player Dossier
2008-2009LSU
R.J. Jackson
WR • 6'0" • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
R.J. Jackson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.6
Consistency
68.4
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · LSU
0809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
R.J. Jackson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · LSU. R.J. Jackson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
LSU paired 141 primary output with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · LSU
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
35.3
Efficiency
78.6
Usage
19.6
Consistency
68.4
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 55. Mississippi State: 40. Alabama: 26. Louisiana Tech: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 6 by 61.1. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 86.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins38.3 · n=3
First Half47.5 · n=2 · +24.5 vs Second Half
Second Half23 · n=2 · -24.5 vs First Half
All Games35.3 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | LSU | -1 | 0 | 5.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 141 | 78.6 | 19.6 | 142 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55
Primary metric
55 receiving yards with a 61.1 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Alabama
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
-1
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
-1 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · LSU
141 primary output · 78.6 efficiency · 19.6 usage
66.5
#2
2008 Postseason · LSU
24.2
-1 primary · 0 efficiency · 5.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.9369
Westside · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
140
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.