Player Dossier

2008-2009

Middle Tennessee

Chris McClover

WR • 6'4" • Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Chris McClover reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

15.6

Efficiency

80.2

Consistency

40.6

Season Value

59.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

080909

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
3
Program Path
Middle Tennessee
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Chris McClover, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Chris McClover reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Chris McClover played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Chris McClover recorded 655 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Middle Tennessee.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Middle Tennessee paired 541 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

45.1

Efficiency

80.2

Usage

15.6

Consistency

40.6

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 55. Clemson: 18. Memphis: 47. Maryland: 110. North Texas: 48. Troy: 4. Mississippi State: 36. Western Kentucky: 149. Florida Atlantic: 18. Florida International: 29. Louisiana: 10. Arkansas State: 17

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 4 by 91.7. Clemson: 1 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. Maryland: 7 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 100. Troy: 1 by 26.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 80. Western Kentucky: 6 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 60. Florida International: 1 by 100. Louisiana: 1 by 66.7. Arkansas State: 3 by 37.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.7 · Games = 9 · +34.3 vs Losses
Losses19.3 · Games = 3 · -34.3 vs Wins
First Half47 · Games = 6 · +3.8 vs Second Half
Second Half43.2 · Games = 6 · -3.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Best efficiency game

100 vs Florida International

Result
Mon 12/21vs Southern MissW 42-3245513.813.80123
Sat 11/21vs Arkansas StateW 38-143175.75.70112
Sat 11/14vs LouisianaW 34-171101010010
Sat 11/7vs Florida InternationalW 48-211292929029
Sat 10/31@ Florida AtlanticW 27-202189909
Sat 10/24vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · 2+ TDW 62-24614924.824.80236
Sat 10/17vs Mississippi StateL 6-273361212024
Wed 10/7@ TroyL 7-31144404
Sat 9/26@ North TexasW 37-213481616027
Sat 9/19@ Maryland100 receiving yardsW 32-31711015.715.70035
Sat 9/12vs MemphisW 31-1434715.715.70022
Sat 9/5@ ClemsonL 14-371181818118

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Middle Tennessee

    2008-2009

    Opening stop

Season Progression

200820092009
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2008 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee11458.18.4
2009 PostseasonMiddle Tennessee54180.215.6427
2009 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee54180.215.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Western Kentucky

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

149

Primary metric

149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Mississippi State

29

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#3

Maryland

110

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Southern Miss

55

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.

#5

Memphis

47

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

541 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 15.6 usage

59.1

#2

2009 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee

59.1

541 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 15.6 usage

#3

2008 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee

39.8

114 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2008 · Rating 0.7444

Saugus · Santa Clarita, CA

Committed To
Middle Tennessee
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2008

Career Facts

1

Career teams

3

Seasons tracked

655

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.