Player Stats

Dominique Lindsay College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,034
Rushing yards
1,787
Receiving yards
247
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2005 Regular SeasonEast Carolina622821018142
2006 PostseasonEast Carolina685850041
2006 Regular SeasonEast Carolina612710720041
2007 PostseasonEast Carolina13880230.3
2007 Regular SeasonEast Carolina1325519758430.3
2008 Regular SeasonEast Carolina00000-
2009 PostseasonEast Carolina1216415113181.9
2009 Regular SeasonEast Carolina121,1671,029138681.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

East Carolina paired 1,331 primary output with 52.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 52.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · East Carolina

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

110.9

Efficiency

52.9

Usage

37.7

Consistency

74.9

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 164. App State: 114. West Virginia: 55. Marshall: 99. SMU: 154. Rice: 83. Memphis: 147. Virginia Tech: 69. Tulsa: 185. UAB: 48. Southern Miss: 101. Houston: 112

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 34 by 48.7. App State: 16 by 73.4. West Virginia: 9 by 47.3. Marshall: 21 by 46. SMU: 26 by 62.2. Rice: 13 by 67.2. Memphis: 23 by 66.1. Virginia Tech: 14 by 53.7. Tulsa: 33 by 58. UAB: 20 by 25.6. Southern Miss: 21 by 50.7. Houston: 28 by 35.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins111.1 · Games = 8 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses110.5 · Games = 4 · -0.6 vs Wins