Usage Score
37.7
Player Dossier
2005-2009East Carolina
RB • 5'10" • Charlotte, NC, USA
Dominique Lindsay leans workhorse runner traits and 52.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
37.7
Efficiency
52.9
Consistency
74.9
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · East Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dominique Lindsay, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · East Carolina. Dominique Lindsay leans workhorse runner traits and 52.9 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
East Carolina paired 1,331 primary output with 52.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 52.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
110.9
Efficiency
52.9
Usage
37.7
Consistency
74.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 164. Unknown: 114. West Virginia: 55. Marshall: 99. SMU: 154. Rice: 83. Memphis: 147. Virginia Tech: 69. Tulsa: 185. UAB: 48. Southern Miss: 101. Houston: 112
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 34 by 48.7. Unknown: 16 by 73.4. West Virginia: 9 by 47.3. Marshall: 21 by 46. SMU: 26 by 62.2. Rice: 13 by 67.2. Memphis: 23 by 66.1. Virginia Tech: 14 by 53.7. Tulsa: 33 by 58. UAB: 20 by 25.6. Southern Miss: 21 by 50.7. Houston: 28 by 35.4
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
73.4 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Arkansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 17-20 | 33 | 151 | 4.60 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4.8 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Houston2+ TD | W 38-32 | 25 | 75 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 37 | 4 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Southern Miss | W 25-20 | 20 | 98 | 4.90 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UAB | W 37-21 | 18 | 45 | 2.50 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.4 |
| Mon 11/16 | @ Tulsa100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 44-17 | 31 | 172 | 5.50 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5.6 |
| Fri 11/6 | vs Virginia Tech | L 3-16 | 13 | 69 | 5.30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.9 |
| Wed 10/28 | @ Memphis100 rush yards | W 38-19 | 22 | 139 | 6.30 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Rice | W 49-13 | 12 | 78 | 6.50 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6.4 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ SMU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 21-28 | 24 | 144 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Marshall | W 21-17 | 18 | 76 | 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ West Virginia | L 20-35 | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 15 | 105 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | East Carolina | 228 | 51.7 | 12.6 | — |
| 2006 Postseason | East Carolina | 212 | 50.3 | 15.1 | -16 |
| 2006 Regular Season | East Carolina | 212 | 50.3 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | East Carolina | 263 | 29.3 | 10.5 | 51 |
| 2007 Regular Season | East Carolina | 263 | 29.3 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | -263 |
| 2009 Postseason | East Carolina | 1,331 | 52.9 | 37.7 | 1,331 |
| 2009 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1,331 | 52.9 | 37.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
185
Primary metric
185 scrimmage yards and 48.5 usage.
#2
South Florida
85
Primary metric
Loss with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 26.1 usage.
#3
UCF
73
Primary metric
Loss with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 16.9 usage.
#4
SMU
154
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
154 scrimmage yards and 40.6 usage.
#5
Arkansas
164
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
164 scrimmage yards and 47.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · East Carolina
1,331 primary output · 52.9 efficiency · 37.7 usage
66.4
#2
2009 Regular Season · East Carolina
66.4
1,331 primary · 52.9 efficiency · 37.7 usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · East Carolina
36.8
228 primary · 51.7 efficiency · 12.6 usage
7
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7
Independence · Charlotte, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,034
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dominique Lindsay quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit