Usage Score
17.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Colorado
Riar Geer
TE • 6'4" • USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Riar Geer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.9
Consistency
52
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Colorado
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Riar Geer, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Colorado. Riar Geer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Riar Geer played TE for Colorado. Across 4 tracked seasons, Riar Geer recorded 974 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Colorado.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Colorado paired 402 primary output with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
40.2
Efficiency
72.9
Usage
17.4
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado State: 65. Toledo: 28. Wyoming: 26. West Virginia: 89. Texas: 11. Kansas: 65. Kansas State: 42. Missouri: 19. Texas A&M: 25. Oklahoma State: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado State: 6 by 72.2. Toledo: 3 by 62.2. Wyoming: 4 by 43.3. West Virginia: 7 by 84.8. Texas: 1 by 73.3. Kansas: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 3 by 93.3. Missouri: 2 by 63.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 83.3. Oklahoma State: 4 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins38.7 · Games = 3 · -2.2 vs Losses
Losses40.9 · Games = 7 · +2.2 vs Wins
First Half43.8 · Games = 5 · +7.2 vs Second Half
Second Half36.6 · Games = 5 · -7.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/20 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28-31 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-34 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Missouri | L 17-36 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Kansas State | L 6-20 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Kansas | W 34-30 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Texas | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Thu 10/1 | @ West Virginia | L 24-35 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Wyoming | W 24-0 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Toledo | L 38-54 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Colorado State | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Colorado | 261 | 72.6 | 21.4 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Colorado | 128 | 59.3 | 9.1 | -133 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Colorado | 183 | 63.9 | 14.1 | 55 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Colorado | 402 | 72.9 | 17.4 | 219 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
West Virginia
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Colorado
402 primary output · 72.9 efficiency · 17.4 usage
60.3
#2
2006 Regular Season · Colorado
49.5
261 primary · 72.6 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Colorado
38.4
183 primary · 63.9 efficiency · 14.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.81
Valley Christian · San Jose, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
974
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.