Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2005-2009Texas A&M
WR • 6'0" • Keller, TX, USA
Howard Morrow reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.1
Efficiency
63.8
Consistency
61.5
Season Value
60.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Howard Morrow, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas A&M. Howard Morrow reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Howard Morrow played WR for Texas A&M. Across 5 tracked seasons, Howard Morrow recorded 2 rushing yards, 772 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 449 primary output with 63.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.4
Efficiency
63.8
Usage
15.1
Consistency
61.5
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 65. New Mexico: 20. Utah State: 5. UAB: 71. Arkansas: 51. Oklahoma State: 47. Kansas State: 75. Texas Tech: 10. Iowa State: 49. Oklahoma: 28. Baylor: 4. Texas: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 5 by 86.7. New Mexico: 3 by 44.4. Utah State: 1 by 33.3. UAB: 5 by 94.7. Arkansas: 6 by 56.7. Oklahoma State: 4 by 78.3. Kansas State: 6 by 83.3. Texas Tech: 2 by 33.3. Iowa State: 6 by 54.4. Oklahoma: 2 by 93.3. Baylor: 1 by 26.7. Texas: 2 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
94.7 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | @ Georgia | L 20-44 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Texas | L 39-49 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Baylor | W 38-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Oklahoma | L 10-65 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Iowa State | W 35-10 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Texas Tech | W 52-30 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Kansas State | L 14-62 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Oklahoma State | L 31-36 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Arkansas | L 19-47 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UAB | W 56-19 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Utah State | W 38-30 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs New Mexico | W 41-6 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 94 | 76.7 | 10.7 | — |
| 2006 Postseason | Texas A&M | 82 | 68.7 | 11.6 | -12 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 82 | 68.7 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -82 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 147 | 80 | 10.7 | 147 |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 449 | 63.8 | 15.1 | 302 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 449 | 63.8 | 15.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31
Primary metric
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas State
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
41
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
449 primary output · 63.8 efficiency · 15.1 usage
60.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Texas A&M
60.1
449 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 15.1 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Texas A&M
45.7
147 primary · 80 efficiency · 10.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8222
Lincoln · Manitowoc, WI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
772
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.