Usage Score
39.3
Player Dossier
2006-2009Tulane
Jeremy Williams
WR • 6'1" • Baytown, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jeremy Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
64.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulane
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulane. Jeremy Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Tulane paired 1,113 primary output with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
92.8
Efficiency
75
Usage
39.3
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 139. BYU: 56. Unknown: 222. Army: 108. Marshall: 53. Houston: 63. Southern Miss: 21. LSU: 78. UTEP: 139. Rice: 113. UCF: 47. SMU: 74
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 5 by 100. BYU: 5 by 74.7. Unknown: 10 by 100. Army: 6 by 100. Marshall: 8 by 44.2. Houston: 6 by 70. Southern Miss: 4 by 35. LSU: 8 by 65. UTEP: 10 by 92.7. Rice: 10 by 75.3. UCF: 7 by 44.8. SMU: 5 by 98.7
Split Comparison
Wins123.5 · n=2 · +51.9 vs Losses
Losses71.6 · n=9 · -51.9 vs Wins
First Half106.8 · n=6 · +28.2 vs Second Half
Second Half78.7 · n=6 · -28.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ SMU2+ TD | L 21-26 | — | 5 | 74 | 13.5 | 14.80 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ UCF | L 0-49 | — | 7 | 47 | 5.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Rice100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-28 | — | 10 | 113 | 10.3 | 11.30 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-38 | — | 10 | 139 | 13.8 | 13.90 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ LSUHigh volume | L 0-42 | — | 8 | 78 | 8.3 | 9.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Southern Miss | L 6-43 | — | 4 | 21 | 4.7 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Houston | L 16-44 | — | 6 | 63 | 7.7 | 10.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs MarshallHigh volume | L 10-31 | — | 8 | 53 | 3.7 | 6.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Army100 receiving yards | W 17-16 | — | 6 | 108 | 13.8 | 18 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 222 | 16.6 | 22.20 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs BYU | L 3-54 | — | 5 | 56 | 8.6 | 11.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | L 13-37 | — | 5 | 139 | 17.7 | 27.80 | 0 | 68 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulane | 484 | 74.3 | 19.9 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulane | 773 | 86.8 | 28.6 | 289 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 437 | 79.5 | 25.3 | -336 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 1,113 | 75 | 39.3 | 676 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
222
Primary metric
222 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
188
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
188 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
157
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
124
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
1,113 primary output · 75 efficiency · 39.3 usage
64.8
#2
2007 Regular Season · Tulane
59.8
773 primary · 86.8 efficiency · 28.6 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
51.2
437 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 25.3 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7
Sterling · Baytown, TX
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,807
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.