Usage Score
16.2
Player Dossier
2006-2009Memphis
Carlos Singleton
WR • 6'9" • Brownsville, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Carlos Singleton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
55.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Memphis
060707080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carlos Singleton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Memphis. Carlos Singleton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Memphis paired 791 primary output with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.1
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
16.2
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 27. Middle Tennessee: 45. Unknown: 40. Marshall: 62. UCF: 5. UTEP: 105. Southern Miss: 42. East Carolina: 70. Tennessee: 14. UAB: 76. Houston: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 60. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. UCF: 1 by 33.3. UTEP: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 93.3. East Carolina: 9 by 51.9. Tennessee: 2 by 46.7. UAB: 6 by 84.4. Houston: 2 by 70
Split Comparison
Losses40.2 · n=9
First Half47.3 · n=6 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half44.6 · n=5 · -2.7 vs First Half
All Games46.1 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | @ Houston | L 14-55 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs UAB | L 21-31 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Tennessee | L 28-56 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 10/28 | vs East CarolinaHigh volume | L 19-38 | — | 9 | 70 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Southern Miss | L 16-36 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 35-20 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ UCF | L 14-32 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Marshall | L 16-27 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 44 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 14-31 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Ole Miss | L 14-45 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Memphis | 300 | 76.3 | 10.5 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Memphis | 767 | 86.8 | 15.2 | 467 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Memphis | 767 | 86.8 | 15.2 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Memphis | 791 | 85.8 | 22.1 | 24 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Memphis | 791 | 85.8 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 507 | 76.3 | 16.2 | -284 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Memphis
791 primary output · 85.8 efficiency · 22.1 usage
68.2
#2
2008 Regular Season · Memphis
68.2
791 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Memphis
66.5
767 primary · 86.8 efficiency · 15.2 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7444
Haywood · Brownsville, TN
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,365
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.