Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2008-2009Memphis
Brian Hall
WR • 5'11" • Collierville, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brian Hall reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
42
Consistency
32.6
Season Value
34.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Memphis
0809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Hall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Memphis. Brian Hall reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Memphis paired 51 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 42 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
7.3
Efficiency
42
Usage
7.1
Consistency
32.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 4. Unknown: 13. UCF: 0. UTEP: 8. East Carolina: 4. Tennessee: 22. Tulsa: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. UTEP: 1 by 53.3. East Carolina: 2 by 13.3. Tennessee: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Losses6 · n=5
First Half6.3 · n=4 · -2.4 vs Second Half
Second Half8.7 · n=3 · +2.4 vs First Half
All Games7.3 · n=7
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Memphis | 51 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 51 | 42 | 7.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
13
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
8
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
4
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Memphis
51 primary output · 100 efficiency · 5.9 usage
43.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
34.4
51 primary · 42 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7667
Collierville · Collierville, TN
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
102
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.