Usage Score
0
Player Dossier
2006-2009Minnesota
RB • 6'0" • Oakdale, MN, USA
Jay Thomas leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
0
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jay Thomas, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota. Jay Thomas leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Jay Thomas played RB for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jay Thomas recorded 464 rushing yards, 134 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 296 primary output with 56.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Purdue: 0. Illinois: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
— vs Illinois
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Minnesota | 274 | 53.2 | 9.9 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Minnesota | 274 | 53.2 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Minnesota | 296 | 56.3 | 11 | 22 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 28 | 37.1 | 5.9 | -268 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | 0 | -28 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with 107 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
107
Primary metric
107 scrimmage yards and 18.9 usage.
#2
Iowa
128
Primary metric
Win with 128 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
128 scrimmage yards and 27.6 usage.
#3
Northwestern
107
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
107 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#4
Indiana
79
Primary metric
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 12.8 usage.
#5
Florida Atlantic
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
23 scrimmage yards and 6.9 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
296 primary output · 56.3 efficiency · 11 usage
50.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Minnesota
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2006 Postseason · Minnesota
45.6
274 primary · 53.2 efficiency · 9.9 usage
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8137
Lee's Summit · Lee's Summit, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
598
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.