Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2009Temple
RB • 5'11" • Philadelphia, PA, USA
Lamar McPherson leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
6
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
14
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Temple
Snapshot
Lamar McPherson, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Temple. Lamar McPherson leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 23.1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2009 Postseason | Temple | 8 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 54.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 8 | 118 | 91 | 27 | 0 | 54.5 |
Related Context
Lamar McPherson played RB for Temple. Across 3 tracked seasons, Lamar McPherson recorded 110 rushing yards and 27 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Temple.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Temple paired 129 primary output with 38.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
16.1
Efficiency
38.4
Usage
9.3
Consistency
53.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 11. Villanova: 9. Penn State: 27. Buffalo: 37. Army: 16. Toledo: 6. Akron: 25. Kent State: -2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 95.8. Villanova: 2 by 46.9. Penn State: 3 by 37.5. Buffalo: 11 by 35. Army: 6 by 27.8. Toledo: 3 by 20.8. Akron: 6 by 43.4. Kent State: 4 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
95.8 vs UCLA
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 8 | 20.9 | 3.4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | -8 |
| 2009 Postseason | Temple | 129 | 38.4 | 9.3 | 129 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 129 | 38.4 | 9.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Buffalo
Week 4 · W 37-13 · Conference game
Win with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37
Scrimmage Yards
67.8 takeover
37 scrimmage yards and 23.9 usage.
#2
@ UConn
Week 3 · L 17-22
6
Scrimmage Yards
47.8 takeover
Loss with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 4.2 usage.
#3
@ Akron
Week 11 · W 56-17 · Conference game
25
Scrimmage Yards
46.7 takeover
Win with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
25 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
#4
vs UCLA
Week 1 · L 21-30 · Postseason
11
Scrimmage Yards
43.6 takeover
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
#5
@ Penn State
Week 3 · L 6-31
27
Scrimmage Yards
43.3 takeover
Loss with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
27 scrimmage yards and 6.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Temple
129 primary output · 38.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
54.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Temple
54.5
129 primary · 38.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Temple
23.1
8 primary · 20.9 efficiency · 3.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.