Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2008-2009Tulsa
WR • 6'4" • Fort Smith, AR, USA
Slick Shelley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20
Efficiency
87.6
Consistency
72
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Slick Shelley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Tulsa. Slick Shelley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Slick Shelley played WR for Tulsa. Across 2 tracked seasons, Slick Shelley recorded 1,138 receiving yards and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Tulsa paired 627 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
56.8
Efficiency
87.6
Usage
20
Consistency
72
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 68. New Mexico: 65. Oklahoma: 24. Unknown: 57. Boise State: 99. UTEP: 98. SMU: 8. Houston: 39. Memphis: 53
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 5 by 90.7. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. UTEP: 5 by 100. SMU: 2 by 26.7. Houston: 2 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 70.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Memphis | W 33-30 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Houston | L 45-46 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs SMU | L 13-27 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 10/22 | @ UTEP | L 24-28 | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 0 | 42 |
| Thu 10/15 | vs Boise State | L 21-28 | — | 3 | 99 | 33 | 33 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-45 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ New Mexico2+ TD | W 44-10 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Tulane | W 37-13 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 45 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 627 | 86.7 | 17.9 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 627 | 86.7 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 511 | 87.6 | 20 | -116 |
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Boise State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Tulsa
627 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
65.6
#2
2008 Regular Season · Tulsa
65.6
627 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
65.5
511 primary · 87.6 efficiency · 20 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8217
Sylvania Northview · Sylvania, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,138
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.