Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2005-2009Tennessee
RB • 6'0" • New Bern, NC, USA
Montario Hardesty leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
86
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Tennessee
Snapshot
Player Story
Montario Hardesty built his college career from 2005 through 2009 as a running back from New Bern, NC wearing No. 2, spending time with Tennessee. The clearest part of Montario Hardesty's career was his backfield...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Montario Hardesty, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Tennessee. Montario Hardesty leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Tennessee | 2 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| 2006 Postseason | Tennessee | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 46.1 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tennessee | 13 | 436 | 382 | 54 | 4 | 46.1 |
| 2007 Postseason | Tennessee | 10 | 56 | 35 | 21 | 0 | 44 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tennessee | 10 | 342 | 338 | 4 | 3 | 44 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tennessee | 10 | 295 | 271 | 24 | 6 | 41.5 |
| 2009 Postseason | Tennessee | 13 | 118 | 39 | 79 | 1 | 81.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tennessee | 13 | 1,529 | 1,306 | 223 | 13 | 81.6 |
Related Context
Montario Hardesty played RB for Tennessee. Across 5 tracked seasons, Montario Hardesty recorded 2,391 rushing yards, 405 receiving yards, and 27 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Tennessee paired 1,647 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
126.7
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
43.6
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 118. Western Kentucky: 162. UCLA: 92. Florida: 100. Ohio: 169. Auburn: 146. Georgia: 97. Alabama: 114. South Carolina: 133. Memphis: 76. Ole Miss: 66. Vanderbilt: 184. Kentucky: 190
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 22 by 35.9. Western Kentucky: 19 by 85.5. UCLA: 27 by 35.6. Florida: 21 by 49.8. Ohio: 22 by 75.8. Auburn: 24 by 52.1. Georgia: 20 by 50.5. Alabama: 22 by 38.3. South Carolina: 24 by 56. Memphis: 15 by 50. Ole Miss: 17 by 40.7. Vanderbilt: 33 by 56.6. Kentucky: 41 by 48
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
85.5 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Virginia Tech | L 14-37 | 18 | 39 | 2.20 | 1 | 4 | 79 | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Kentucky100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-24 | 39 | 179 | 4.60 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 4.6 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-16 | 32 | 171 | 5.30 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5.6 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Ole Miss | L 17-42 | 14 | 55 | 3.90 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 3.9 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Memphis | W 56-28 | 13 | 60 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs South Carolina100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 31-13 | 23 | 121 | 5.30 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Alabama | L 10-12 | 18 | 48 | 2.70 | 0 | 4 | 66 | 5.2 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Georgia | W 45-19 | 20 | 97 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Auburn2+ TD | L 22-26 | 21 | 90 | 4.30 | 1 | 3 | 56 | 6.1 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Ohio100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 34-23 | 20 | 140 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 7.7 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Florida | L 13-23 | 20 | 96 | 4.80 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs UCLA | L 15-19 | 26 | 89 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Western Kentucky100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 63-7 | 18 | 160 | 8.90 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8.5 |
Player Story
Montario Hardesty built his college career from 2005 through 2009 as a running back from New Bern, NC wearing No. 2, spending time with Tennessee. The clearest part of Montario Hardesty's career was his backfield work: 2,391 rushing yards, 560 carries, 26 rushing touchdowns, and 405 receiving yards across 48 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with Tennessee. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 405 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 48 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Tennessee.
The arc is straightforward: Montario Hardesty moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Tennessee | 18 | 28.7 | 4.7 | — |
| 2006 Postseason | Tennessee | 438 | 41.4 | 17.9 | 420 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tennessee | 438 | 41.4 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Tennessee | 398 | 45.7 | 15.9 | -40 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tennessee | 398 | 45.7 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tennessee | 295 | 36.5 | 17.7 | -103 |
| 2009 Postseason | Tennessee | 1,647 | 51.9 | 43.6 | 1,352 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1,647 | 51.9 | 43.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Ohio
Week 4 · W 34-23
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169
Scrimmage Yards
88.2 takeover
169 scrimmage yards and 39.3 usage.
#2
vs Vanderbilt
Week 12 · W 31-16 · Conference game
184
Scrimmage Yards
84.5 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
184 scrimmage yards and 55 usage.
#3
vs Western Kentucky
Week 1 · W 63-7
162
Scrimmage Yards
83.1 takeover
Win with 162 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
162 scrimmage yards and 27.5 usage.
#4
@ Kentucky
Week 13 · W 30-24 · Conference game
190
Scrimmage Yards
82.7 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
190 scrimmage yards and 68.3 usage.
#5
vs Air Force
Week 2 · W 31-30
81
Scrimmage Yards
80.2 takeover
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 37.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Tennessee
1,647 primary output · 51.9 efficiency · 43.6 usage
81.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tennessee
81.6
1,647 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 43.6 usage
#3
2006 Postseason · Tennessee
46.1
438 primary · 41.4 efficiency · 17.9 usage
5
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.