Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Tennessee paired 1,647 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Tennessee | 2 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| 2006 Postseason | Tennessee | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 46.1 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tennessee | 13 | 436 | 382 | 54 | 4 | 46.1 |
| 2007 Postseason | Tennessee | 10 | 56 | 35 | 21 | 0 | 44 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tennessee | 10 | 342 | 338 | 4 | 3 | 44 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tennessee | 10 | 295 | 271 | 24 | 6 | 41.5 |
| 2009 Postseason | Tennessee | 13 | 118 | 39 | 79 | 1 | 81.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tennessee | 13 | 1,529 | 1,306 | 223 | 13 | 81.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Tennessee paired 1,647 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
126.7
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
43.6
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 118. Western Kentucky: 162. UCLA: 92. Florida: 100. Ohio: 169. Auburn: 146. Georgia: 97. Alabama: 114. South Carolina: 133. Memphis: 76. Ole Miss: 66. Vanderbilt: 184. Kentucky: 190
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 22 by 35.9. Western Kentucky: 19 by 85.5. UCLA: 27 by 35.6. Florida: 21 by 49.8. Ohio: 22 by 75.8. Auburn: 24 by 52.1. Georgia: 20 by 50.5. Alabama: 22 by 38.3. South Carolina: 24 by 56. Memphis: 15 by 50. Ole Miss: 17 by 40.7. Vanderbilt: 33 by 56.6. Kentucky: 41 by 48
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.