Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2006-2009Utah
TE • 6'2" • Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Ben Hendy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
2%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
32
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
45
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
35
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Ben Hendy, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Temple. Ben Hendy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 62.7 |
| 2009 Postseason | Utah | 3 | - | 0 | 0 | 46.4 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah | 3 | 4 | 28 | 1 | 46.4 |
Related Context
Ben Hendy played TE for Temple and Utah. Across 2 tracked seasons, Ben Hendy recorded 45 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Temple paired 17 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 33.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
9.3
Efficiency
33.4
Usage
11.3
Consistency
14.7
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 0. UNLV: 27. Wyoming: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
60 vs UNLV
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2006
Opening stop
Utah
2009
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 17 | 56.7 | 10 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Utah | 28 | 33.4 | 11.3 | 11 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah | 28 | 33.4 | 11.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ UNLV
Week 7 · W 35-15 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27
Receiving Yards
72.9 takeover
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
@ Buffalo
Week 1 · L 3-9
17
Receiving Yards
63.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs Wyoming
Week 9 · W 22-10 · Conference game
1
Receiving Yards
9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ California
Week 1 · W 37-27 · Postseason
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Temple
17 primary output · 56.7 efficiency · 10 usage
62.7
#2
2009 Postseason · Utah
46.4
28 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Utah
46.4
28 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.