Player Stats

Logan Paulsen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
888
Receptions
71
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2005 Regular SeasonUCLA2233036.5
2006 PostseasonUCLA11218061.6
2006 Regular SeasonUCLA1125313061.6
2007 PostseasonUCLA7243050.9
2007 Regular SeasonUCLA710101150.9
2008 Regular SeasonUCLA1118054.6
2009 PostseasonUCLA13331064.6
2009 Regular SeasonUCLA1326331064.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

UCLA paired 362 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 63.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · UCLA

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

27.8

Efficiency

63.5

Usage

12.6

Consistency

53

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Temple: 31. San Diego State: 5. Tennessee: 22. Kansas State: 23. Stanford: 14. Oregon: 26. California: 96. Arizona: 23. Oregon State: 29. Washington: 56. Washington State: 27. Arizona State: 9. USC: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 68.9. San Diego State: 1 by 33.3. Tennessee: 2 by 73.3. Kansas State: 2 by 76.7. Stanford: 2 by 46.7. Oregon: 1 by 100. California: 5 by 100. Arizona: 3 by 51.1. Oregon State: 4 by 48.3. Washington: 1 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 90. Arizona State: 2 by 30. USC: 1 by 6.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins24.7 · Games = 7 · -6.8 vs Losses
Losses31.5 · Games = 6 · +6.8 vs Wins