Player Stats

Chane Moline College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,027
Rushing yards
622
Receiving yards
405
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonUCLA10880134.3
2006 Regular SeasonUCLA101339340434.3
2007 PostseasonUCLA1116160040.4
2007 Regular SeasonUCLA1120018020140.4
2008 Regular SeasonUCLA1021611898136.3
2009 PostseasonUCLA121136944056.4
2009 Regular SeasonUCLA12341138203656.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

UCLA paired 454 primary output with 53 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 53 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · UCLA

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

37.8

Efficiency

53

Usage

14.7

Consistency

30.6

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Temple: 113. San Diego State: 13. Tennessee: 12. Kansas State: 7. Stanford: 6. Oregon: 21. California: 9. Oregon State: 24. Washington: 20. Washington State: 85. Arizona State: 90. USC: 54

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 18 by 54.9. San Diego State: 1 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 50. Kansas State: 1 by 58.3. Stanford: 1 by 50. Oregon: 4 by 46.9. California: 2 by 37.5. Oregon State: 3 by 66.7. Washington: 4 by 30.2. Washington State: 10 by 85.4. Arizona State: 26 by 35.4. USC: 17 by 21

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.6 · Games = 7 · +25.8 vs Losses
Losses22.8 · Games = 5 · -25.8 vs Wins