Player Stats

Greg Boone College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
588
Receptions
45
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonVirginia Tech5110032.9
2006 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech5458132.9
2007 PostseasonVirginia Tech7244059
2007 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech79123059
2008 PostseasonVirginia Tech13341072.2
2008 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech1319237372.2
2009 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech7775051.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

Virginia Tech paired 278 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 69.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Virginia Tech

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

10.7

Efficiency

69.4

Usage

12.5

Consistency

68.3

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 5. Miami: 10. Duke: 25. Georgia Tech: 12. Maryland: 11. NC State: 0. Virginia: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 33.3. Miami: 1 by 66.7. Duke: 2 by 83.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 80. Maryland: 1 by 73.3. Virginia: 1 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins10.5 · Games = 6 · -1.5 vs Losses
Losses12 · Games = 1 · +1.5 vs Wins