Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Vanderbilt paired 1,332 primary output with 53.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Mackenzi Adams College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 3,350
- Passing yards
- 2,779
- Rushing yards
- 571
- Touchdowns
- 19
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 4 | 310 | 224 | 86 | 0 | 33.5 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 12 | 1,332 | 1,043 | 289 | 12 | 65.3 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 9 | 1,018 | 882 | 136 | 5 | 52.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 6 | 690 | 630 | 60 | 2 | 55.4 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with 186 yards of offense and 49.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
Games
6
Primary Metric / G
115
Efficiency
55.6
Usage
18
Consistency
74.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Carolina: 46. Georgia: 53. Georgia Tech: 155. Florida: 116. Kentucky: 134. Tennessee: 186
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Carolina: 10 by 55.8. Georgia: 8 by 76.7. Georgia Tech: 25 by 55.5. Florida: 33 by 49.9. Kentucky: 35 by 46.3. Tennessee: 44 by 49.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins46 · Games = 1 · -82.8 vs Losses
Losses128.8 · Games = 5 · +82.8 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Mackenzi Adams
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.