Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Akron paired 345 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Jeremy Bruce College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 662
- Receptions
- 66
- Touchdowns
- 2
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | West Virginia | 4 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 23.8 |
| 2006 Regular Season | West Virginia | 7 | 5 | 72 | 0 | 36.3 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Akron | 11 | 29 | 345 | 1 | 75.7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 12 | 29 | 219 | 1 | 54.4 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Morgan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Akron
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
18.3
Efficiency
46.5
Usage
15.3
Consistency
56.7
Best Game by takeover score
Morgan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 30. Morgan State: 42. Indiana: 9. Central Michigan: 5. Ohio: 20. Buffalo: 15. Syracuse: 17. Northern Illinois: 9. Kent State: 17. Temple: 6. Bowling Green: 47. Eastern Michigan: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 66.7. Morgan State: 4 by 70. Indiana: 1 by 60. Central Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Ohio: 3 by 44.4. Buffalo: 2 by 50. Syracuse: 3 by 37.8. Northern Illinois: 2 by 30. Kent State: 2 by 56.7. Temple: 1 by 40. Bowling Green: 5 by 62.7. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 6.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20.3 · Games = 3 · +2.8 vs Losses
Losses17.6 · Games = 9 · -2.8 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jeremy Bruce
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.