Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2006-2009Pittsburgh
Oderick Turner
WR • 6'3" • Teaneck, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Oderick Turner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.5
Consistency
71.7
Season Value
47.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Oderick Turner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Oderick Turner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 660 primary output with 82 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
22.7
Efficiency
72.5
Usage
12
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 30. Buffalo: 11. Navy: 32. NC State: 26. Louisville: 39. UConn: 31. Rutgers: 7. South Florida: 15. Syracuse: 24. Notre Dame: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 66.7. Buffalo: 3 by 24.4. Navy: 3 by 71.1. NC State: 1 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 86.7. UConn: 3 by 68.9. Rutgers: 1 by 46.7. South Florida: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 2 by 80. Notre Dame: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins21.4 · n=8
First Half27.6 · n=5 · +9.8 vs Second Half
Second Half17.8 · n=5 · -9.8 vs First Half
All Games22.7 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/15 | vs Notre Dame | W 27-22 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Syracuse | W 37-10 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs South Florida | W 41-14 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Rutgers | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs UConn | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Louisville | W 35-10 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ NC State | L 31-38 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Navy | W 27-14 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Buffalo | W 54-27 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 660 | 82 | 19.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 496 | 87.9 | 18.7 | -164 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 298 | 82 | 11.9 | -198 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 227 | 72.5 | 12 | -71 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
74
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#5
Navy
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
660 primary output · 82 efficiency · 19.7 usage
64
#2
2007 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
59.3
496 primary · 87.9 efficiency · 18.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
48
298 primary · 82 efficiency · 11.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7667
Teaneck · Teaneck, NJ
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,681
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.